this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
785 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59008 readers
4608 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The U.S. government’s road safety agency is again investigating Tesla’s “Full Self-Driving” system, this time after getting reports of crashes in low-visibility conditions, including one that killed a pedestrian.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says in documents that it opened the probe on Thursday with the company reporting four crashes after Teslas entered areas of low visibility, including sun glare, fog and airborne dust.

In addition to the pedestrian’s death, another crash involved an injury, the agency said.

Investigators will look into the ability of “Full Self-Driving” to “detect and respond appropriately to reduced roadway visibility conditions, and if so, the contributing circumstances for these crashes.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KonalaKoala@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Every time I hear something about pedestrian being killed by something self-driving, it begins to irk me as to why are we pushing for such and such technology.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 36 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The bad news is people hitting and killing pedestrians is so common you don't hear about it. Fuck Musk and all that, but some number of people are always going to get killed. Even the FSD system that was as close to perfect as possible would still occasionally kill someone in large enough numbers, because there's too many variables to account for. If the numbers are lower than a human driving, it's a positive.

We should be trying to move away from cars though ideally. Fuck electric cars, FSD cars, and all other cars. A bus, train, bike, or whatever else would be safer and better for the environment.

[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Public transport is the way to go, just need to break the cycle of six decades of automobile addiction.

[–] beanlink@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Lets install adaptive headlights to stop blinding people or allowing manufacturers to install chrome accents on the rear of a vehicle to again stop blinding people or even just maybe make a smaller truck that isn't lifting ego and instead actual building materials.

NHSTA:

[–] Fuzzy_Red_Panda@lemm.ee -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fuck Musk and all that, but some number of people are always going to get killed.

That's easy to say, but do you want to be one of the people who gets killed? I don't.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's that easy to say and yeah, I don't want to be one of the people killed, driverless or not. Cars are fucking deadly. 20 pedestrians die every day to cars. If we can get that number down but have them die to FSD vehicles, that's better. I don't care who or what is driving.

I'd rather not have cars everywhere, but if we do I want them to be as safe as possible (for everyone, not just the driver). If that includes FSD we should do it, even if the number of pedestrian deaths doesn't hit zero (it never will) because the alternative is well above zero.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk -2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If I'm get killed by a driver on their phone, I want them to go to prison.

If I'm killed by a Waymo or whatever, who goes to jail then?

If we really must have self driving cars, limit their speed to 20mph in built up areas.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If you're dead, why the fuck do you care who goes to jail? Shouldn't we care more about people dying than revenge after?

[–] interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Don't reason deterrentists, they cause wars and send millions to prison

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wouldn't care. I hope my wife and family would.

"He died for a good cause: Tesla's stock price" is not what they want to hear.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't like Tesla, but no one is dying to support FSD. They're dying because multi-ton vehicles driving down the road next to fleshy meatbags sometimes ends up with them colliding. It doesn't really matter who, if anyone, is behind the wheel. I'd rather them not come into contact. I'm in favor of everything that reduces that. I don't really care if it ruins someone's revenge fetish.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 0 points 1 week ago

OK, we'll make it simple then.

If you make a self driving car and it kills a pedestrian, then you give the family of the victim $50 million, and a seat on the board. Forever. Every decision you make from then on will be looking into the faces of the people whose lives you destroyed, while they turn down your bonuses.

Also, I don't believe for one second that a self driving car is safer than somebody who should legally be behind the wheel of a car. If the sun is in your eyes, you slow down. If you can't see the conditions ahead, you slow down.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Number of people killed by Waymos self driving: 0? Number of people appear to think Waymo's self driving has killed: hundreds?

Tesla's don't have the tech to make it safe enough, but Waymo hasn't been the ones at fault for all this fear mongering.

[–] PeroBasta@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Because it is generally proven to save lifes. You'll never hear of "thanks for the auto-brake system no one got injured and everything was boring as usual" but it happened a lot (also to me in first person).

I don't like Musk but in general its a good thing to push self driving cars IMO. I drive 2 hours per day and the amount of time where I see retarded people doing retarded stuff at the wheel is crazy.

[–] DillyDaily@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is the thing. Musk and everything his company does in terms of labour and marketing, and just their whole ethos is unethical as fuck, and I can't stand that as a society we are celebrating Tesla.

But self driving cars are not inherently bad or dangerous to persue as a technological advancement.

Self driving cars will kill people, they'll will hit pedestrians and crash into things.

So do cars driven by humans.

Human driven cars kill a lot of people.

Self driving cars need to be safer than human driven cars to even consider letting them on the the road, but we can't truly expect a 0% accident rate on self driving cars in the early days of the technology when we don't expect that of the humanity driven cars.

[–] ano_ba_to@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

Air travel is generally safer than driving too, but every accident is studied thoroughly. Self-driving is fine, but anyone trying to implement it should be held to a high standard. Boeing slacked off and they're facing some backlash.

[–] KonalaKoala@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, it is not generally proven to save lives, you are listening to lies somewhere. Its not a good thing to push self-driving cars and Musk is the one being retarded. Plus he supports Trump and not Harris.

[–] PeroBasta@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The technology behind it is proven to save lifes. The reaction time of a full brake to stop a car crash i had the "luck" of experiencing on a Volkswagen was outstanding.

Same thing for the lane assist function if you are sleepy

[–] KonalaKoala@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Same thing for the lane assist function if you are sleepy

If you are sleepy behind the wheel, you need to pull over, get off the road, and take a rest.

[–] PeroBasta@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Thanks mom. I brought cases to prove my point I'm not saying you should go on a road trip while sleepy.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because self-driving cars are safer than human drivers, when implemented properly. A proper one is absolutely loaded with sensors, radar, laser, sonar; not just some cameras like Tesla's system.

If you ever get the chance to, hop in a Waymo and you'll become a believer too (currently available only in Cali and AZ). These little robotaxis see everything at all times, not just what's in front of them like humans. I trust them more than I'd trust any human driver. They can avoid accidents that you and I would never see coming. Witnessed this first-hand.

[–] KonalaKoala@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There is no proof they are safe, and we should stop trying to replace people.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Again, ride in one yourself when you get the chance and I promise you you'll change your mind immediately.

[–] KonalaKoala@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Again, not only no valid proof they are safe, but they are being used to put people out of work like Taxi and Uber drivers.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

It's for the better. They will find other jobs. You sound like the people crying about coal mines being closed down.