this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
64 points (95.7% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26533 readers
1180 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

American law outlines a series of protections for those accused of crimes but not yet convicted. (Like the 4th-6th amendments)

Does your country have any unique/novel protections of the rights of potentially innocent people accused but yet to be convicted?

If not are there any protections you think should be in place?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SGforce@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The name of the accused can't usually be reported on in Canada. Though there seems to be many exceptions. Also, released offenders get a lot of protection. It's pretty controversial, especially when it's someone famous like this case.

[–] SGforce@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Another odd Canadian one. It has been codified that a suspect saying the words "I'm sorry" cannot be used as proof of guilt. Since in Canada especially, it leans a bit more into meaning "pardon" or "excuse me" rather than how an American might interpret it more as an apology.

[–] JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

To me the whole "I'm sorry" being a legal admission of guilt thing is bullshit. Like is there any situation where that has actually been beneficial to someone not trying to commit insurance fraud?

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Following her release, Homolka settled in Quebec, where she married a brother of her lawyer.

Honestly the most shocking part. Wtf