this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
147 points (91.5% liked)

World News

38859 readers
2373 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Could you fucking stop spamming this garbage propaganda?

Everyone except the filthy Zionists knew that Pro-Palestinian rhetoric is covered by the freedom of speech.

Essentially this article is Zionists complaining that "we have to respect other people? But mooom I don't want to"

Fuck off and breathe in a a cactus

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Everyone except the filthy Zionists knew that Pro-Palestinian rhetoric is covered by the freedom of speech.

  1. Pro palestine and anti-zionism are different concepts

  2. This is the UK where we don't have a fetishised version of free speech

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Pro palestine and anti-zionism are different concepts

My point exactly. This was Pro-Palestinian rhetoric, which is now being painted as Anti-Zionist rhetoric, for obvious reasons.

From the article:

An employment tribunal in the UK has concluded that holding the belief that Israel's actions against Palestinians amount to apartheid, ethnic cleansing and genocide are "worthy of respect in a democratic society".

That's Pro-Palestinian beliefs.

This is the UK where we don’t have a fetishised version of free speech

I'm Finnish, not American.

It is also worded in such a way as to compare it to the Forstater judgement because Kath Viner has to work in transphobia to every part of the Guardian