this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
673 points (97.9% liked)

Science Memes

10726 readers
3215 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sources that I’d prefer to regulate in terms of animal rights, but every time that comes up, you people divert the conversation to “if you’re not gonna be vegan you’re evil either way so it doesn’t matter” and everyone tunes out.

Pack it up, vegans. This person was going to wish upon a star to regulate animal agriculture, which would've done it, but we just had to go and advocate for making material changes on a level we have control over, and that forced them to be explicitly fine with abuse. If only we had your thoughts and prayers, what a horrible miscalculation on our part.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Thoughts and prayers? No. Fines. Potentially jailtime. Potentially forcing them to sell farms and factories.

But you do not want it. You're delusional and thinking the animals will just have to endure for a little while longer while you're working on getting the entire planet to switch to a vegan diet.

Besides, you need the worst cases to stay around.

You need to film conversion content, and it'll have to be fresh and gruesome content to be effective.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thoughts and prayers? No. Fines. Potentially jailtime. Potentially forcing them to sell farms and factories.

And how do you intend to implement those things? Thoughts and prayers.

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee -2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yes. Because we don't know how to vote.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Oh, which candidate that supports those things you mentioned were you going to vote for but now aren't? Love to hear even a single name.

Of course, you can't answer that, because that's not a realistic path in the short term. Let's say you were going to run for office on that platform. First, the major corporations that have a vested interest in keeping things the way they are are going to dump money into the opposition. Second, people will oppose it because it would increase the price of meat - they'll say you're an elitist who wants to make it so that only the rich can have access to it, and emphasize the effect it'll have on grocery bills. They'll also talk about the environmental impact your regulations would cause, since it would take more land to treat animals humanely. And they will also call you a hypocrite for refusing to give up meat while calling the production process unethical, to the point of being deserving of jail time.

So explain to me how exactly you would've overcome those obstacles, if only us mean insidious vegans weren't so preoccupied with asking you to give up your treats.