this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
5 points (55.8% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7170 readers
200 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

While Ms. Stein condemns both “zombie political parties” as tools of Wall Street and war profiteers, her campaign has focused largely on hammering Ms. Harris, blaming the White House she serves for relentless violence in Gaza and Lebanon.

And Democrats, as never before, are focused on Ms. Stein.

The party has prepared a negative ad blitz for the election’s final weeks, its first-such effort ever directed at a third-party candidate. Fearful that Ms. Stein might divert critical votes in places like Michigan, Democrats are also pressing their case on billboards plastered recently across swing states:

“Jill Stein Helped Trump Once. Don’t Let Her Do It Again.”

She dismisses the “spoiler mythology” that has come to define her mainstream identity, noting — accurately enough — that some of her supporters would never back Ms. Harris anyway.

She says that Democrats would do well to look inward, disputing that she bears any responsibility for Mr. Trump’s fortunes, then or now.

“Those conversations never go anywhere,” Ms. Stein, 74, said in a wide-ranging interview.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works -5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

No one is even talking about past collusion accusations. We are talking about right now.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

It would be helpful to not leak a ten year old image in a seven year old article if there was evidence. Do present it.

If Stein was truly colluding with Russia the Democrats would have had a legal foot to bar her from running. And they would not need to make up crazy conspiracy theories which rely on censorship.

[–] Grapho@lemmy.ml 0 points 9 hours ago

Everyone I don't like is a Russian asset, the Democrat's guide to political discussion