this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
113 points (90.6% liked)

Green Energy

2165 readers
100 users here now

everything about energy production

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm all for putting solar panels all over the place, but won't these get dusty and oily and need loads of cleaning after trains pass over?

Also, costing €623,000 over three years sounds rather expensive for just 100m (although that roughly equates to 11KW).

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Could be a difference in availability of land, but in Sweden you'd not be granted permission for something as mundane as a solar farm if it meant taking farmland out of production.

As for the forests... That's my greatest fear, that climate change will kill off large swathes of Oxygen producers by increasing ocean temperatures or making trees unable to thrive!

How is agricultural land defined if it isn't used to grow biomass?

[–] golli@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How is agricultural land defined if it isn’t used to grow biomass?

I can see how i wasn't specific enough with my wording. This is what i am talking about. Basically growing plants for the purpose of energy production, rather than e.g. food or material useage.

[–] Tobberone@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Oh, i see😊 When the EED takes effect in 2025/2026 id wager the return will be better for that use than solar panels, as all public buildings will be fitted with some sort of solar capture. Wood is a great energy store, as well, which we need more of.

Oh, and in roughly the same time frame the steps of mandatory mixing of renewable sources in central heating will start, so such agricultural land will be economically more important.