this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
108 points (92.9% liked)

196

16407 readers
1935 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That'd be nice.

90 and 120 are rolling through the greens. Are posters mostly green? That seems odd to me.

[–] bob_lemon@feddit.org 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The problem is that averaging hue makes no sense at all because hue is not a longest scale.

If you take a red poster (0) and a blue poster (240), it averages to green. Or take red (0) and red (359), averaging to cyan (180).

[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The average of 0° and 359° is obviously 359.5°.

it's a radial scale.

[–] bob_lemon@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

By that logic, the average of red and cyan is both purple and lime. Still useless.

[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago

Not if there is a clear trend. If most movie posters are blue, three average will be blue.

But i agree, it is useless if there is no clear trend.

[–] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wouldn't trust someone who tried to visualize hue like this to make that calculation correctly.

[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

You know what, I completely agree.

[–] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

It would have made more sense if they had shown the distribution of hue as a polar graph and just had one every decade to show how it changes over time.