this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
89 points (94.1% liked)

Australian Politics

1298 readers
12 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
lodion@aussie.zone
daniel@aussie.zone
Whirlybird@aussie.zone
billytheid@aussie.zone
89
If Australians knew the whole truth about Indigenous history, Lidia Thorpe’s royal outburst would not have been a shock | Celeste Liddle (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 1 month ago by NaevaTheRat@vegantheoryclub.org to c/australianpolitics@aussie.zone
45 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] goodthanks@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I agree the yes campaign was a poor one. Also, there were 2 opposing messages being put forward simultaneously:

  1. The voice is a big leap forward and will improve the lives of indigenous people.

  2. The voice is just an advisory body with no real power.

I voted yes, but didn't think the voice was an impressive proposal. I just thought the outcome of a no vote would be worse. The fact that so many people didn't understand what was proposed is partly a media issue, and partly a government incompetence issue. But it also raises the question of why so many people will feel passionately about a position they haven't even fucking bothered to research. We can't have democracy unless citizens put in a bit of fucking effort to understand the society they live in, which includes political proposals.