this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
160 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

43939 readers
425 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] arken@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

In English, yes. My point is that cache/r/t is the root of both words, the pronunciation changed in english which often happens with loan words, and it certainly is OK to use the local pronunciation -- but correcting someone who uses the correct pronunciation of that word, with self-righteous indignation even, is very silly behavior.

"But we've been pronouncing it wrong for 300 years!"

[โ€“] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

If we said every loan word the way they were originally pronounced in their various native languages then English wouldn't exist.

[โ€“] arken@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Perhaps, probably not - not my point though. My native language has a lot of English loan words with local pronunciation, which is the correct pronunciation of those words in my language according to any dictionary, however to indignantly correct someone using the original english pronunciation for saying it "wrong" would just be bizarre.

[โ€“] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Cool story bro. How about this, you continue to say cache however you want and I'll continue to silently judge you for it and we can all just move on with our day?

๐Ÿ‘

[โ€“] arken@lemmy.world -1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Fine by me, it's obvious you no longer have an argument -- or anything otherwise interesting -- to contribute to this discussion anyway, so what would be the point?

[โ€“] MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I'm not sure what the point of any of this was. It seemed to serve little purpose.

Have a nice day ๐ŸŒž