this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
1542 points (98.5% liked)

People Twitter

5145 readers
1070 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

A tax on the amount of CO2 released per person, both directly and indirectly?

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Good, but hard to measure fairly. Essentially all the emissions for everyone are 'indirect'. They are the result of the processes used to produce the goods we consume, etc. So then, should the consumer be responsible for those emissions directly, or should it be the factory workers, or the people who own the factory, or the people who supplied the fuel that was used to run the factory, or the people who payed the people who supplied the fuel... etc.

We could think about untangling it, but probably easier to just tax the rich and then tackle the CO2 problem separately - probably by also taxing the people who own the factory for emissions.

The tax will burden the end consumer the most - perhaps that's what's need to end especially polluting buying habits: charge the true cost.