Technology

59657 readers

2710 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

396

Wikipedia article blocked worldwide by Delhi high court. (archive.ph)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Dot@feddit.org to c/technology@lemmy.world

97 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Original Link.

More info.

In July 2024, ANI filed a lawsuit against Wikimedia Foundation in the Delhi High Court — claiming to have been defamed in its article on Wikipedia — and sought ₹2 crore (US$240,000) in damages. At the time of the suit's filing, the Wikipedia article about ANI said the news agency had "been accused of having served as a propaganda tool for the incumbent central government, distributing materials from a vast network of fake news websites, and misreporting events on multiple occasions". The filing accused Wikipedia of publishing "false and defamatory content with the malicious intent of tarnishing the news agency's reputation, and aimed to discredit its goodwill".

On 5 September, the Court threatened to hold Wikimedia guilty of contempt for failing to disclose information about the editors who had made changes to the article and warned that Wikipedia might be blocked in India upon further non-compliance. The judge on the case stated "If you don't like India, please don't work in India... We will ask government to block your site". In response, Wikimedia emphasized that the information in the article was supported by multiple reliable secondary sources. Justice Manmohan said "I think nothing can be worse for a news agency than to be called a puppet of an intelligence agency, stooge of the government. If that is true, the credibility goes."

On 21 October, the Wikimedia Foundation suspended access to the article for Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation due to an order from the court.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The article was specifically about India. So people specifically criticized India. Doesn't seem vague to me.

[–] ravhall@discuss.online -1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Okay?

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

You seemed to have trouble understanding what was going on.

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

No, I get it. You want to make something more than it is because you enjoy being mad. So, you pick a big topic to compare it to. One that, if it were true, would theoretically make me look bad. Then you double down on it because, again, you like being mad. You want everything to be the way you want it, and you don’t accept that other people have different opinions that are as equally as valid as your own.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Not sure if copypasta or AI text...

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, clearly you have issues comprehending.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It's true, I have no idea what you are on about and what your messages have to do with the topic

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Yet you feel the need to insert your opinion anyway. Charming.

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago

Do you mean the original topic or what?