this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
135 points (97.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43729 readers
1209 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dragonfucker 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why lump atom in with coal? Atom is great, coal stinks. You're confusing the stats.

[–] DrunkenPirate@feddit.org 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Try to dismantle a nuclear plant. It costs tons of money and time. Ask the people at Nagasaki or Tschernobyl.

Dismantle a coal power plant takes time, but one can reuse the iron and such. All the open mining fields and mining tunnels are the problem. In Western Germany, there are areas where house crack or cars fall down sudden openings caused by old mining tunnels.

Try to dismantle at wind mill or solar fields. It’s a quest of days and some bucks.

I prefer the easy way of living. So, my favorite are renewables.

[–] drq@mastodon.ml 1 points 2 days ago

@DrunkenPirate

> I prefer the easy way of living.

There is no such thing as "easy way of living".

Renewables suck at energy density, predictability and control.

Nuclear gives you all three.

Also, look into the solar panel manufacturing costs to the environment.

Of course, renewables are a must. But by dismantling nuclear you kneecapped yourselves, guys, big time.

@dragonfucker

[–] dragonfucker 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You dismantled your plants because dismantling your plants is hard? πŸ€” That seems backwards. Why not upgrade? Then you never have to dismantle. Keep it alive forever.

[–] AgentRocket@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Upgrading would have cost way more. one of the reasons atom power is so expensive (without government subsidies) is the cost of the plants which needs to be recouped as well as the price of the uranium. not to mention that we haven't found a suitable place to store the waste for those thousands of years until it's harmless.

[–] dragonfucker 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Who cares about cost. We should be willing to pay whatever it takes to end fossil fuel use.

[–] AgentRocket@feddit.org 5 points 2 days ago

That's why we invest in renewables.