541
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Dot@feddit.org to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 66 points 2 years ago

and Keanu Reeves

Unfortunately, not him either. He's such a big fan of the bigot Graham Hancock that he's involved in Hancock's Netflix series.

And you don't have to believe me about Hancock. There are indigenous Americans that are happy to tell you all about it.

The description for the Secrets of the Ancients program listed on the Chaco filming permit application said the program would explore “one of archaeology’s biggest mysteries: the peopling of the Americas”.

It went on to state: “We’ll uncover the latest findings about the earliest inhabitants of the Americas and reveal remarkable scientific knowledge that’s been handed down for generations. Where did humans settle first in the Americas, and what do we know about them?”

Hancock, who is not an archeologist, has attracted the ire of those in the profession, as well as Native groups, for pushing a theory that an advanced ice age society, responsible for modern understandings of maths, architecture and agriculture, was wiped out by floods triggered by comet strikes nearly 12,000 years ago.

Evidence of this is found at ancient sites around the world, Hancock claims, with the writer visiting such places in countries including Turkey, Mexico and Indonesia in the first season of the Netflix show, aired in 2022. During the show, which Netflix promoted with the tagline “What if everything we know about prehistoric humans is wrong?”, Hancock railed against “mainstream archaeology” for not accepting his theories.

“[Hancock] presents his theories as being superior to what the first inhabitants of the area say about their own history,” said Stewart Koyiyumptewa, tribal historic preservation officer for the Hopi Nation.

The Hopi people have lived in or near the Grand Canyon for at least 2,000 years and claim a sacred site inside the canyon as their place of emergence. They also have strong ties to Chaco Canyon.

A Grand Canyon national park staff member who is Native American also pushed back against issuing a permit to ITN.

“This is embarrassing and a discredit to our agency when we have been working hard to respect Indigenous people and right many historical wrongs,” wrote the staff member in an email to Grand Canyon park management. “This is just degrading.”

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/01/netflix-ancient-apocalypse-canceled

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 81 points 2 years ago

Pseudo-Scientific Documentaries of that kind has made me cancel my Netflix subscription over two years ago.

It's a shame what they sell us as facts.

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 43 points 2 years ago

You either die a hero or live long enough to start making bad decisions. And Keanu is hundreds of years old.

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 2 years ago

I understand your stance but compared to Mr. Beast, not the same comparison. Mr. Rogers, Steve Erwin, and Levar Burton (should always be included) I would listen to their input on helping everyone. They are smart and good.

Keanu and maybe Woody Harrison are more of good people that you don't hear horrible stuff about that are universally famous.

No kid touching, woman abusing, racist rants, or Nazi praising episodes. Morgan Freemen and Bill Cosby use to be that way but over time it started to crack. Even Dave Grohl has fallen from the list. Of course these examples are not a 1:1.

The second group, like I said, is more good not smart. They have flaws but are universal good people. Ross was a great person but horrible judgment in some people. Look at his son's battle for his family name.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Keanu and maybe Woody Harrison are more of good people that you don’t hear horrible stuff about that are universally famous.

If you're talking about Woody Harrelson, he "doesn't believe in germ theory" and once circulated a web post that said COVID was spread by 5G. source

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago

Harrison is a all natural, holistic person. His wife owns a company that sells stuff like that. However, you never heard about him harassing people or going on a racist rant. That is my point. No one is looking to Harrison for advice. Just like I'm not looking to Keanu for advice.

I'll give you an example. Bill Murray was considered a great guy. Would randomly show up at people's wedding when invited, still has a answering machine, and seemed like a real life goof ball. Then the reports of his interaction with Lucy Liu came out. Then reports of him abusing people on set. His image is one of an abusive asshole on set.

If you tell me you get your political views or any advice from him, I would laugh in your face. Not bc of everything I just said but bc he doesn't seem like a smart person. He seems like the class clown that smokes to much weed.

[-] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 years ago

“[Hancock] presents his theories as being superior to what the first inhabitants of the area say about their own history,” said Stewart Koyiyumptewa, tribal historic preservation officer for the Hopi Nation.

The Hopi people have lived in or near the Grand Canyon for at least 2,000 years and claim a sacred site inside the canyon as their place of emergence. They also have strong ties to Chaco Canyon.

Obviously Hancock is a crackpot but saying that he offends other people with equally falsified theories is not exactly strong criticism...

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

How about this, then?

IMO that's basically white supremacy. The most generous possible thing you could say is that Hancock is too stupid to recognize racist bullshit when he sees it in terms of things like Quetzalcoatl being a white man (utter bullshit) but I don't think he's that stupid.

[-] BeardedBlaze@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Wait, you think Hancock came up with Quetzalcoatl being a white bearded man? XD

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

No. I think he perpetuates that racism.

Here is Quetzalcoatl (and not in his usual winged serpent form) from the pre-Spanish Maya. Does he look like a white man to you or a local indigenous person? Don't you think if Hancock didn't want to just perpetuate racist bullshit he could have just looked that up himself, what with being a journalist and all?

But that's just one image, right? And no color! I'm sure after the Spanish came and had them draw him...

Oh.

I thought journalists were supposed to do research.

Of course, if you're a journalist who wishes to perpetuate racism...

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 years ago

He's a bigot for having his own Lil theory about settlers from 12,000 years ago?

[-] ech@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Nobody knows what's going in inside that melon except him, but it really does reek of the old mindset of colonials "discovering" lands where people had been living already for millennia, and assuming they're too dumb to be worth considering. Or even making a spectacle of them like they're some sort of animal.

Even if it's not intentionally malicious, that sort of disregard has some amount of bigotry attached.

[-] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There were colonials 12,000 years ago?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Please read the excerpts from his book I pasted below. He thinks indigenous Americans worshiped white saviors.

[-] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Mate you find a problem with everything, take up whittling or something for the sake of your mental health. Nobody's perfect, as the saying goes.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

"Nobody's perfect" is quite an interesting excuse for bigotry.

Is that how you're also not "perfect?"

[-] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Probably, amongst a million other things.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Weird. Somehow I can be both imperfect and not a bigot. In fact, lots of people can.

Weird how that works.

[-] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I still think you should try whittling!

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Why? Does whittling stop you from saying things that are bigoted?

Because I don't need that.

[-] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It's just good to have some hobbies that don't involve a screen. I don't whittle, but who knows, maybe you could?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

Do explain how you know I don't have any "hobbies that don't involve a screen."

I always love to hear from Flying Squid experts about that person's life. I learn so much from them.

this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2024
541 points (96.9% liked)

News

39528 readers
1452 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS