this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
468 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

58990 readers
4186 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
468
Trying to reverse climate change won’t save us, scientists warn (www.theverge.com)
submitted 3 days ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.world
138 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

We are wildly far away from having the technology to do that. A single genome wouldn't provide the genetic diversity for a sustainable population. We would need hundreds or thousands of genomes for each species to ensure that non-related individuals could mate.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

We absolutely have the technology, we just don't have the money to gather the data. Or we haven't chosen to allocate it.