this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
473 points (97.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

9554 readers
789 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The new law permits pedestrians to cross a roadway at any point, including outside of a crosswalk. It also allows for crossing against traffic signals and specifically states that doing so is no longer a violation of the city’s administrative code. But the new law also warns that pedestrians crossing outside of a crosswalk do not have the right of way and that they should yield to other traffic that has the right of way.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] drake@lemmy.sdf.org 47 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I think you might have picked a bad community to share your sympathies for smooth car traffic, I’m afraid.

For what it’s worth, I think it’s reasonable enough to forbid pedestrians from crossing high-speed (60+ mph) roads, but otherwise they should have full right of way over any road, and fuck the cars. They can just be patient and deal with it.

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe, but the alternative is unrealistic and simply not the reality we Live in.(at least in the United States)

[–] drake@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 9 hours ago

That’s how every progressive movement starts, until activists make them reality. If it’s a good idea, it’s a good idea - and if that’s not the way that things are done, the question stops being “is this a good idea”, and starts being “how can we implement this good idea”.

[–] SatouKazuma@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

But what if those roads didn't have to exist at all. We could replace those with dedicated high speed rail corridors.

[–] drake@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 9 hours ago

Which, presumably, you’d also restrict people from walking on :P