this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
27 points (88.6% liked)

Australia

3620 readers
110 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nath@aussie.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

On the other side, I gladly take my Outlander off the beaten track. I took it through a river crossing last month that I probably shouldn't have. It handled it like a champion, though.

I don't know whether I'd take one of these through that same crossing.

[–] trk@aussie.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

.... You wouldn't take a Shark through a crossing that an Outlander can handle? :-\

Outlander has 190mm of ground clearance and a wading depth of 400mm, the Shark has 230mm of ground clearance and a wading depth of 600mm (or 700mm, depending on which website you believe).

[–] Nath@aussie.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It's not a dig at the Shark, specifically. It's my lack of familiarity with electric vehicles in general. I've never seen an electric vehicle drive through water.

The depth of the water was about the height of the wheels. Which I'm guessing is past 400mm. I probably wouldn't have taken the car along that road to that crossing if I'd known about it ahead of getting there. I was already calculating the odds of getting across and what I'd do if I got bogged down in the water etc.

[–] dgriffith@aussie.zone 6 points 3 weeks ago

The depth of the water was about the height of the wheels. Which I'm guessing is past 400mm.

Hm. Better check your diff/transfer case oils just in case before things get expensive. Outlanders don't have high mounted diff breathers so you might have got some water in there.

[–] trk@aussie.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I've never seen an electric vehicle drive through water.

https://youtu.be/hnnMYLtamaY

https://youtu.be/UBwmAMNI9qk

https://youtu.be/tzA0U53HF2g

I'd be more worried about the ICE a Shark is carrying around then the EV part tbh

[–] Nath@aussie.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Those first two videos are a bit extreme - I obviously wouldn't have attempted either of those in the Outlander. I doubt I'd have attempted it in the Teslas, either. Those were big risks with minimal rewards in both examples. Thought the second was obviously a planned "Is this possible?" crossing.

I'm equal parts impressed and horrified. I know enough about electrics to be horrified at what water can do if it gets in your motor. Would the vehicle be covered under warranty if you inundated your motor doing this?

[–] trk@aussie.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

Everything is sealed, and generally water proof in general. I'm sure you've seen sump pumps, aquarium wave makers, fuel pumps...

Electric is so much more reliable than combustion. Literally it's only downside is the energy density of the batteries.