this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2024
475 points (97.8% liked)

Fuck Cars

9563 readers
759 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The new law permits pedestrians to cross a roadway at any point, including outside of a crosswalk. It also allows for crossing against traffic signals and specifically states that doing so is no longer a violation of the city’s administrative code. But the new law also warns that pedestrians crossing outside of a crosswalk do not have the right of way and that they should yield to other traffic that has the right of way.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SatouKazuma@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Ditching cars should be done everywhere (not just in populated cities).

[–] frank@sopuli.xyz 15 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Agree, but it's certainly easier to do in NYC than rural places in the US, so I advocate for starting there

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works -4 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

do you really expect people in rural areas to ditch cars?

will they go back to carts and horses?

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 11 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

The US used to have a comprehensive rail network. Every single town had a train station. We already had the solution to this problem.

[–] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I live in a rail hub in the us. The city is nicknamed after it and train tracks literally run through the city center.

It would take me 6 hours to walk there.

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 6 points 20 hours ago

Please tell me you're exaggerating. I live in a small city and it only takes me maybe an hour to walk across town. If it's taking you 6 hours, it's not rural.

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 6 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

If it takes 6 hours to walk across your city it's not rural. Your city needs comprehensive public transportation.

[–] Sludgehammer@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

I think he means it would take six hours of walking to reach his city. I mean I live four miles outside of town (which incidentally I'd need to travel to to reach a railroad) and even though it's smaller than 3000 people it still calls its self a "city". Also I'd like to note it's four miles of hilly terrain, which depending on season may feature hundred degree plus temperatures or foot deep snow.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

and what do you use to get to the train station?

how do you carry goods to that station? Does your train have a stop in every farm?

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 6 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Wow you're right there is a use case for a vehicle therefore it's literally impossible to have public transit in rural areas, despite the fact that it already existed /s

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

it's not like i don't hate cars, i do. But i really can't see how you're going to convince "rurals" with that argument

good luck to you

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 2 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

We aren't discussing tactics for convincing people of anything. We're discussing facts. And the fact is there's no reason public transit can't work in rural areas as you stated.

[–] Enoblk@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago

A bus isn't going to drive a mile up everyone's private roads in the middle of nowhere, public transport is not a one size fits all, it can get people in town to other parts or other towns but it can't replace cars for everyone

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

i'm not from the U.S.

there's a well established network of rails here and we can say that rail transport is the backbone of this country.

yet people in rural areas still think that cars are essential just to survive ☞ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellow_vests_protests

i may think otherwise, i can live without a car, but it's condescending to tell them "there's no reason public transit can't work in rural areas"

even those who commute by bike+train have cars because "public transit" isn't a solution to all their needs.

[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 0 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

It may or may not be "condescending" to tell people they're wrong, but it doesn't make them right or change the basic facts.

I'd recommend checking out a different community since you seem to be very invested in making excuses for pro car people, and less interested in challenging people's assumptions about cars.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

no, thank you. i'm fine here

your condescension continues 👍

[–] SatouKazuma@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

Honestly? Buses would be a good short-term solution that can be implemented immediately with the right political will, and enough force.