this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024

81 points (96.6% liked)

Asklemmy

43975 readers

588 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
!lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

mekhos@lemmy.ml

14specks@lemmy.ml

81

Should we A) colonise other planets or B) build habitats in the middle of space, like O'Neill Cylinders and stuff? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 3 weeks ago by KevinFromSpace@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

79 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] superkret@feddit.org 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

our planet could easily be wiped by a number of things.

Most likely by us, while we waste our limited resources on useless things like spaceships

if we dont plan for a planetary catastrophe out of our control, our species is doomed.

Oh no, how will the universe ever recover from this tragedy?

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 0 points 3 weeks ago

Oh no, how will the universe ever recover from this tragedy?

yep, this is what people resort to when they dont have a real point. 'so what?!' pfft