this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
845 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19118 readers
2654 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Following Donald Trump’s election victory, Republicans are now openly embracing Project 2025, a policy agenda from The Heritage Foundation that outlines sweeping conservative reforms.

Despite Trump’s attempts to distance himself from the project during his campaign due to its extreme proposals—including expanded executive powers, a national abortion ban, stricter contraception limits, harsh immigration policies, and the elimination of agencies like the Department of Education—his allies quickly began celebrating its implementation.

Former Trump adviser Steve Bannon and commentator Matt Walsh publicly affirmed the agenda, signaling the GOP's commitment to enacting these controversial policies in Trump’s second term.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 54 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

They know they can't win if people know who they are and what they want. Maybe this will teach a small fraction of their supporters who they really are.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 80 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

People knew, they still voted for him.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 36 points 2 weeks ago

They gave him a fucking mandate

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

There are some who have voted out of ignorance, and not malice. You're right, but not in every case.

[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Willfully ignorant is almost more malicious than spite.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah. I consider both types to be bad people, but it's important to know the difference sometimes. I refuse to be reduced to inaccurate arguments just because we lost.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Willful ignorance. It takes a certain type to somehow ignore every red flag that is presented before them.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

every red flag

And the bull horn, and the press releases and the public speeches.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not like they've gone through any pains to hide it. Honestly, he stood on stage and shouted it at people. He said it directly to the press.

I'm not sure he could have tried any harder to tell them exactly what his plan was and who he is.

He didn't win despite who he is; he won because of it. He won because his base is that awful.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And I will NEVER let them forget it.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

I wish they had the shame to process it.

[–] Sestren@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

Have you seen none of the flyers/banners that popped up this election? The fact that he's a felon is celebrated. The fact that he's a rapist is celebrated. The fact that he openly speaks against overtime pay is celebrated. Fuck, even his divorces are celebrated. He could literally shoot someone in the face at a rally, and it would just boost his support.

He's Homelander, but fat and without superpowers.

[–] Lets_Eat_Grandma@lemm.ee 12 points 2 weeks ago

They don't care to understand the details or the nuance. They don't need to. The team they are cheering on has told them what to do and they enjoy obeying their masters.