this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
653 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59575 readers
3234 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

FCC chair: Speed standard of 25Mbps down, 3Mbps up isn’t good enough anymore::Chair proposes 100Mbps national standard and an evaluation of broadband prices.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dji386@infosec.pub 130 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It's 2023. Anything less than symmetrical gigabit is nonsense. We shouldn't have to settle for overpriced crumbs from ISPs.

[–] imperator3733@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Symmetrical gigabit is a bit much for a baseline. Should it be widely available for all, and for a good price? Absolutely. But plenty of people (probably a majority even) could be adequately served by something like 300 down/100 up as a baseline tier.

[–] vzq@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

It’s not about what people need. It’s about building infrastructure for new services and applications.

Besides, digging a trench is digging a trench. Just put in the fiber. It’s 2023.

[–] neshura@bookwormstory.social 18 points 1 year ago

imo the asymmetry only serves to upsell content creators to business plans. I do agree with you on the speeds though, gigabit is a bit overblown for average joe but it should be an option in most places for people that need it (Content Creators, WFH Visual Artists, Garage Startups)

[–] 889296@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Today, maybe. But what about in ten years’ time?

[–] regbin_@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IMO the focus should be on lowering the prices. A lot of people in my country still rely on spotty mobile data as their primary internet. Imagine 100 mbps fiber for $10 a month, that would be awesome.

[–] Gutless2615@ttrpg.network 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Lol In Italy I get gigabit for about 6€

Edit: whoops thats for my unlimited calls, text and 150gb 5g mobile plan. I pay a whopping 30€ for actual-unlimited-not-rate-limited-after-a-TB gigabit.

[–] Giooschi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Though let's be honest, this is not something generally available.

[–] Gutless2615@ttrpg.network 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It is throughout Europe. We’ve been getting hosed in the states for years.

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

A 1 Gbps up/down in Denmark is around 40-50€, and low speeds like 100/100 is more like 25-35€.

Same for Norway and Sweden. Everything is unlimited of course.

[–] lrnz92@feddit.it 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Gutless2615@ttrpg.network 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Right, it’s actually 30€ with TIM, recently upgraded from the €15 plan, my bad. Obviously a huge and glaring oversight. Tell me again what people are paying in the states for a percentage of that speed again and reflexively defend the shit system, please. €6 is what I pay for my unlimited calls, text and 150gb mobile data plan.

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't disagree, but I think even just setting it to 500M symmetrical would be a MASSIVE improvement and a more achievable goal. Few regions right now are equipped for fiber and even fewer homes.

Most homes in the US have a coax connection, and with current tech coax connections can do a little over a gig bandwidth total (up+down). That said, we should be quickly ratcheting up to 500/500 while the fiber rollout hopefully accelerates.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The depressing part is how much fiber is out there, but dark or locked in ridiculous agreements with private owners that will keep it from being the municipal service it deserves to be.

The last house I owned had fiber in the front yard that the ISP refused to hook up. The entire neighborhood (300+ houses) had the same situation. Verizon laid the fiber, and Frontier refused to let anyone use it.

[–] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why does it matter if it’s 500/500 or 1000/1000? Once the fiber is there it makes no difference. In fact, 500Mbit symmetrical is probably more expensive to deploy.

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Once the fiber is there it makes no difference

Because the fiber isn't there. We could achieve 500/500 on current networks without running fiber to every single home. I'm just saying it's a good interim goal as we work towards a full fiber rollout.

[–] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Funny thing is, they are selling vapor. They are renting the usage of equipment, nothing more. There's no finite amount of internet and you have to use it carefully. Sure there's limits in that equipment, but essentially prices are all over-inflated. In my shitty little country I have 350/150 for around 15€, 300 channels TV included. For gigabit I'd pay a bit more, around 30€.