this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
984 points (98.3% liked)

Programming Humor

2676 readers
1 users here now

Related Communities !programmerhumor@lemmy.ml !programmer_humor@programming.dev !programmerhumor@kbin.social !programming_horror@programming.dev

Other Programming Communities !programming@beehaw.org !programming@programming.dev !programming@lemmy.ml !programming@kbin.social !learn_programming@programming.dev !functional_programming@programming.dev !embedded_prog@lemmy.ml

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There’s just so much more opportunity for feedback, use case stories, and a variety of perspectives in open source development.

Good enterprise development does all those things as well, but there is always a bigger barrier to the user when you have to design behind a curtain.

[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm pretty sure it's not lack of user feedback. It's MBAs deciding the user is wrong and unprofitable, therefore better add more tracking and ads.

[–] namarupa@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Exactly. These companies have more feedback than they could ever parse. They only listen if said feedback results in loss of profit.

[–] CtrlAltDyeet@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Yup, and not just ads. At one of my jobs at a SECURITY company the bugs are considered a liability. Features were prioritised, vulnerabilities be damned.

After that experience I doubt most proprietary software is more secure than open source