902

Honestly call or email the Democratic party offices and voice that you one hundred percent agree with Sanders.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago
[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It's not.. I was aware of her 82 page economic plan. How come you weren't aware of it? It's your fault that you weren't aware of her economic plan while people like me were aware of it. If I did you then you could have done it.

[-] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Informing the electorate of the plans is the job of the candidate.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Harris did inform us of her 82 page economic plan. I wouldn't have known about her plan otherwise. You just were not paying attention. That is primarily your fault. Although it is partly the media's fault also.

[-] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

If a candidate's campaign doesn't work, it's always the candidate's fault.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

It's not. There is no way Harris could have personally come to your house and tell you to start paying attention to the real world of reality. That doesn't scale.

[-] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

Maybe the reason Harris lost was because she had people like you running her campaign.

[-] btaf45@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Maybe the reason why Harris lost is because people didn't understand they were screwing themselves and not Harris by not voting for Harris. The media ALWAYS buries the important stuff, so that their billionaire owners can score gigantic GOP tax cuts for the rich. That's why you have to work extra hard to know what is really going on.

The problem is that you thought the media was going to tell you the important stuff. They don't do that because they serve the wealthy elites, not you.

this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
902 points (98.2% liked)

politics

31224 readers
3027 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS