this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
534 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

59575 readers
3463 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I'm no phycisist but I'd bet that the claim "it consumes no energy" is almost certainly false. I get what they mean but this isn't exactly a honest way to describe it.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Strictly speaking, the energy it consumes is the gravitational potential energy of the ore they're mining, which would be consumed anyway in the form of, well, gravity, acting on the ore on the way down. They're just using it productively instead of dissipating it as heat from the brakes. Using only energy that ordinarily would have been wasted is of course very neat, but it's not breaking any laws of physics.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I think it means that the net energy consumption is zero. It can use energy, but it generates enough to offset it.

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 1 week ago

~~energy is converted and never destroyed so it's true~~