this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
820 points (95.8% liked)

Lefty Memes

4373 readers
402 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 61 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I know it has that reputation but I really don’t think California is the most progressive state. Maybe Oregon? Vermont? Not sure to be honest.

It’s pretty much just basic liberals here. And lots of fascists but they hide out away from everyone else most of the time.

[–] Lemonparty@lemm.ee 51 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I also feel like people forget how fucking enormous California is. It's really just a few big liberal areas separated by a giant wasteland of racist rednecks that spans nearly the entirety of the United States from north to South in between. It's huge. If you start in San Diego and drive north for 12 hours you'll be....almost to the top of California. If you do that on the East coast you can drive through nine states.

[–] mean_bean279@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s not even racist rednecks in most of those in-between areas. It’s a lot of Hispanics, and let me tell you… there’s a whoooolllleeeeee lot of racist Hispanics in this state and a lot that are happy they got in and fine with no one else coming in behind them.

[–] Lemonparty@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

You don't have to be white to be racist or a redneck. Go to places like Fresno or Victorville and you'll meet plenty of both. A huge proportion of Hispanics regularly vote against their own interests in California

[–] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

California has the second largest population of Republicans in the US after Texas.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

California also has the largest population of all states. A direct numerical comparison is disingenuous, a statistical comparison would be more valid.

Of registered voters in California, about 25% are Republican. In Texas, 38% are Republican.

https://independentvoterproject.org/voter-registration-by-state

[–] b34k@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Wait… only 38% of voters in Texas are registered republican, yet they win every single time?!

[–] classic@fedia.io 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Gerrymandering is an art form in Texas

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

That's not an issue for state-level elections or national elections, the answer is that many don't vote and many don't register for a party.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

A lot of people don't register for a party

[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

46.5% are registered democrats

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Texas doesn't do voter registration by party so uh

How did they get these

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

And a ton of people choose not to participate at all.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Willy Wonka, but the chocolate factory is Texas:

🎵 Come with me and you'll be
In a world of pure voter suppression 🎵

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 3 points 1 week ago

I have huge skepticism about the Texas number.

Texas DOES NOT have voters register for a party.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Voting for democrats more overwhelmingly doesn't necessarily mean more progressive, just more acceptance for the Democrats in California, who are generally establishment neoliberals.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And yet in local races, primaries, ballot initiatives, progressive candidates and issues all lost. Almost every issue I voted on went the other way. So that has been my experience with California, that it is not very progressive. Admittedly this was a particularly bad election but similar things have happened before.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yep. Cali is ideologically very neoliberal, from the SanFran techbros to the large presense of the Military Industrial Complex. People's ideas are guided by their material conditions, which includes their class interests. I made an introductory reading list for Marxism if you are interested, the section on Dialectical and Historical Materialism as well as Scientific Socialism goes over said phenomena in further detail.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I realize I misunderstood what you were saying. Yes I agree.

I don’t find Marxism very compelling personally but I agree that material conditions certainly do have their influence on many things, perhaps including this issue.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I understand if you don't want to talk about it, whether it be here or in general, but what is it about Marxism you don't find compelling? I can either offer clarification or contextualization, if you want. I'm a big Marxist theory nerd.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It’s such a broad body of work that it’s hard to list all of the issues I have it it. I guess the biggest issue is just that Marx’s writings were an early attempt at describing a more rigorous case for social reform before more scientific theories of social change and economics were developed. So while his ideas were groundbreaking and innovative at the time they were written, not all of them have held up or are relevant to today’s world. And yet I don’t see many Marxists who have been willing to seriously dissect his ideas and take the useful ideas while discarding the bad or irrelevant ones. And in fact, those few who are willing to take a more critical stance are often ostracized and deemed “revisionists” which strikes me as a frankly absurd accusation. If you are not revising your theories then they are no longer theories but mere dogma, and that seems to be the state of mainstream Marxism today.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago

It's pretty difficult to talk about anything if you don't give specifics. What of Marxism hasn't held up? What is better than it? Kinda hard to have a convo that way.

Secondly, taking a critical stance towards Marxism isn't enough to be revisionist. Lenin added on Marxism and analyzed along his contemporary times, and isn't considered a revisionist. Marxism is an ever-evolving ideology. Revisionism rejects pillars of Marxism like Scientific Socialism, the Law of Value, or Dialectical and Historical Materialism.

All that being said, it's difficult to understand what you're getting at if you don't give an example.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

I think it's probably one of those two. California is a bit too diverse idiology when you look at the individual level because it's a huge state, just like Texas (which might go purple under better circumstance). Drive through central valley to know what I mean. Plus we're the state that gave the country Reagan!

As for the slavery, dem voter turnout was fairly bad like in the other states, so that probably had some impact. Some red house seats got flipped though, although that is pretty specific to those communities (turn out lead by house members, believe it or not).

[–] mm_maybe@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

In every list I find online, it's Massachusetts

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't Massachusetts have a law where your security deposit is held by the municipality and your landlord has to prove they deserve it?

One can only dream of such freedom where I live.

[–] mm_maybe@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago

Yes, actually it's beyond that; the landlord has to put the security deposit in an interest-bearing account so that it makes money while they hold it for you!