this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2024
56 points (72.2% liked)

Technology

59549 readers
3417 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Published: October 31, 2024

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gsfraley@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I mean, that's the mechanism by which carbon is removed. It goes into tree, tree dies or gets cut down taking all the solidified carbon with it, new tree gets planted in its place to repeat the cycle. In fact, the fastest way to scrub carbon with the practice is to farm trees, assuming you do it sustainably.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (4 children)

You mean sequestered, not removed. It's one fire away from being back in circulation.

[–] credo@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well, don’t set any data centers on fire.

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

But what if I really want to :(

[–] db2@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Noted for the future.

[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

So is every tree

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Do you propose some alchemy that transforms carbon to another element? Remove carbon from the atmosphere and stop putting more up in there.

[–] ulterno@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

graph of binding energy per nucleon for stable nuclei

And gives some energy (and building material) in the process? Yeah, it's just kinda hard.

[–] obviouspornalt@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 week ago

Only the current generation of trees. The previous generations that have been broken down into soil are mostly not going back into the atmosphere as co2

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So the best thing you can do with a tree, is to cut it down and use it as materials, if we want to release as little CO2 as possible?

And ofc this depends on new trees being planted in its stead.

[–] gsfraley@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Yes. Growing a tree from sapling to a giant trunk removes significantly more carbon from the atmosphere than an existing trunk sitting there at mass, unable to store much more carbon.

And yes, that's why I clarified that new trees would need to be planted, right on the money.

[–] 0x0@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago

And ofc this depends on new trees being planted in its stead.

Hence farming trees...