People Twitter

5258 readers

781 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a tweet or similar
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

1019

Corruption (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 6 days ago by Joker@sh.itjust.works to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

60 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Mastodon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 60 points 6 days ago (2 children)

If the numbers are true it costed him less than 0.1% of his wealth which is surprising how little it takes. Would you spend 0.1% of your wealth to elect a President and gain a government post that will bring you more wealth? Would you spend 1% of your wealth to become insanely rich? 10%?

In the society where power is measured by wealth ultra rich should not exist. Or better such society should not exist.

Also Musk wasn't even the biggest donor. And Harris was okay with this whole thing, she also received enormous donations. Who was against ultra rich? Bernie Sanders. No wonder he was sacked despite popular support.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago

No I wouldnt spend 1 percent of my wealth to become insanely rich. Mostly cause that implies corruption and I aint nearly as bad as my kin though I have far more homicidal tendencies.

[–] ProteanG6777@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 4 days ago

nah, I like the Bannana man's method better. reference- Bannana man in honduras