this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
438 points (88.7% liked)

Technology

59501 readers
4939 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

People are leaving Muskrats fascist supporting platform. So what if they aren't going to Mastedon, they're leaving Twitter. Isn't that enough for us?

I don't need Mastedon to win. I just want Twitter to lose. Once Twitter has been (hopefully) de-platformed we can talk about Mastedon and the Fediverse and the idea of a non-corpo platform.

But it terms of main stream casual appeal, Mastedon still doesn't have it yet, and that's okay.

Mastedon needs to get more casual with the introduction to the Fediverse because for everyday non-tech people, it can be a little confusing.

People see Bluesky as the Twitter replacement because of its simplicity.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago

Once Twitter has been (hopefully) de-platformed we can talk about Mastedon and the Fediverse and the idea of a non-corpo platform.

BlueSky is as prone to enshittification as Twitter. If you're waiting for BlueSky to take off, you're just setting yourself up for the next rug pull.

I mean, go to BS and enjoy it while it lasts. But don't think this is the future.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

They're leaving Musk, but they're not leaving his financial backers, and they're entering into the same kind of "possibly sold to a fascist despot at a moment's notice" situation they just left.

It's short sighted, perfirmative, and doesn't actually make the Internet better at all. It just tells us that people prefer a closed Internet owned by billionaires.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Maybe these people need to feel the cycle first hand a few more times and that's okay. ActivityPub will be even stronger when it comes around again.

[–] el_abuelo@programming.dev 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, what's stopping the richest guy in the world just buying blue-sky as well?

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 days ago

Nothing, and it's already run by web3 folk

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Well said. Maybe there's more to do in the hardware, software and general computing training such that the layman could safely deploy their own Website like we used to be able to do. Then everyone could have their own servers at home like some of us do. True decentralized communication.

Lemmy would be great for dare I say it...church congregations for example. Schools, mechanic forums, unofficial student associations like alpha Kapa whatever. ETC. it's a momentous opportunity.

[–] WeUnite@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago

Yes, it's better to move forward a little than to go backwards. When you move forward you can keep moving forward more later. If you move backwards you have to fight for what you lost before you can get more back.