this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
127 points (92.6% liked)

World News

32349 readers
441 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's a lot of text, and yet, solving all of that is easier, faster and less expensive than nuclear.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Solving politics is cheap and fast.

Utter crap. Solar power companies have been trying for 20 years.

Its not like you came up with a new idea.

[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

AI post? The reply doesn't even make sense.

[–] HumanPenguin@feddit.uk 2 points 5 days ago

Only fails to make sense. If you failed to read any significant portion of the said wall of text.

It was a wall because It was detailed in the history of solar power. Ill ELI5 for you.

We have funded solar power for decades. By allowing the industry to charge equal to other fuels. Meaning, for 20 years or more, companies have been trying to build solar plants all over the nation. And those that got there made a fucking fortune. Until the Tories ended part of it nearly 14 years ago. They stopped the subsidies. But still paid the same rate as more expensive power.

The problem with building solar is the politics from farmers and local communities. As the text described.

So

Solving politics is cheap and fast.

Utter crap. Solar power companies have been trying for 20 years.

Its not like you came up with a new idea.

Of building solar over nuclear. We have been trying for decades.