324
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 155 points 2 years ago

.......yeah, ok. Sounds good.

moves to California

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 27 points 2 years ago

I’ve got “Hotel California” and “San Francisco” battling it out in my head now.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

The fact that ya didnt list California Dreamin annoys me.

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

The mamas and papas make me want to punch myself when I hear them.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago

You could listen to the Beach Boys version.

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

I don't think I've ever heard this...I'll probably check it out

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

How about Going to California?

[-] frunch@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

"someone told me there's a girl out there, with love in her eyes and flowers in her hair"

Damn is that a great little tune, such a warm sound too

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago
[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago
[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

They both somehow fit the situation.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

California Girls. And I'm not specifying which one

[-] Alteon@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

It'll never happen. US Military would never willingly split itself apart, let itself get split apart, or let another nation that it's not allied with have any sort of Army on its equivalent. The 50 states are here to stay.

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 47 points 2 years ago

Never say never. The domestic terrorists/agents of Putin are aching for an actual shooting civil war.

[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

Even a peaceful division of the US would be something they would seriously benefit from. The US permanently divided against itself, each side easy to manipulate into a military conflict against the other. We would have nukes pointed at each other within a decade. It would be like the splitting of India and Pakistan, along with all the accompanying human rights atrocities.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Also how long before an invasion? They’re fascists, fascists don’t sit still while experiencing consequences, they invade

[-] IzzyJ@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

America has never been good at defeating geurilla forces

[-] mkwt@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago
[-] ThrowawayInTheYear23@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago

Sherman should have kept burning the traitors.

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Dude should have gone west after Savannah, Atlanta has its shit mostly together now

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago
[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Agreed, but that seems more a reaction to the progress than a symptom of it not happening.

[-] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 6 points 2 years ago

The US military is going to be replaced by Trump loyalists. Whatever he wants to happen is what’s gonna happen.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I doubt it. He can barely run his shit past the civilian government. I'd be surprised if he knows that the UCMJ exists. The brass aren't going to just fall in line, they know what an illegal order is, and what to do when they are given one.

He may manage to be the first POTUS that is ever told by the military that they have no confidence in him, and will refuse to take orders from him.

[-] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 4 points 2 years ago

Maybe. But I also see a lot of trump support within the military. I really don’t think it will be as cut and dry as you say. Especially if he goes through with his prosecuting and removal of every military officer involved in the Afghanistan exit, which to me just seems like a way to pick and choose loyalists in his military.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

That's the thing he is going to find out. There are procedures for these things, and I seriously doubt that he can luck into getting consistent panels of 5 JAG that will throw the book at people over fabricated evidence. Also what he isn't taking into account is that all of them have the defence that he ordered them to do it, so the buck stops with him. Having the military put the POTUS under military tribunal because he forced them to would be pretty funny though.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago

It's expansive here in the places you may want to live, but seriously... It's worth it. There's also a lot of cheap places that aren't as ideal.

this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
324 points (96.8% liked)

politics

31202 readers
2178 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS