this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
1112 points (96.5% liked)

Political Memes

5479 readers
2618 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You started the whole thread by repeating the talking point about Ukraine’s ascension to Europe as a threat to Putin

It is a threat to Putin!

Was it the same case with Georgia and Tranznitztria?

Yes! I went into Georgia at length here: https://lemmy.world/comment/13494524

This is a Kremlin talking point that gets thrown around non-stop....It seems the choice is appease Putin.... I cannot stress how much of social media is perpetuating this talking point that... Ukraine...now deserve to be the victims of a military invasion

I don't mean at all to patronise you, I assume you are an intelligent person. But have you actually read the thread of posts I've made from the top down to here? How did you get through university making the kind of assumptions you have and be so seemingly unaware of how objective facts can be dispassionately stated? Is the habit of reserving judgement and holding things in tension unfamiliar to you? What subject did you study?

I opened my top comment on this thread saying Russia is the belligerent actor and it is their fault. and it is incredible how (i assume smart) people like you seem to breeze past it and then fear the worst about any comment that doesn't say exactly what they want it to say in the exact manner they expect it, rather than taking the time to ask 'ok, but is this unfamiliar statement actually objectively true?'

The EU expanding to Georgia is catastrophic for Putin's plans to manipulate the middle east. as was Yanukovych stepping down, as was Ukraine planning EU alignement. you can see that right? any no point did i ever say anything of the sort that that justified the violence they then suffered. i went out of my way to state the opposite. the former general secretary of NATO said that EU progress was the "start of the crisis". but then he also said, and I quoted him, that that does not make it Ukraine's fault in any way. both these things can be true at the same time! at least to anyone who hasn't succumbed to twitter-style brainrot

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes. But you're not adding anything new to the discourse or that we haven't heard before. The issue is, I can't know if you're being intentional about it, is that sophists will take your statement about Putin feeling threatened and run with it until the night turns blue and discount everything else (especially the agency of sovereign nations). It seems to be the sole focus of your thesis here anyway. So Putin feels threatened about economic alliances on his border nations. We get it, don't worry. Wow, how insightful.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wow, how insightful

I will point out that this precious 'discourse' you are referring to was in this case started by a talking goose.

It seems to be the sole focus of your thesis here anyway.

You have given away plenty of signs that you have very little experience of digesting real world theses. Maybe leave this one to those who are more well read? You don't have to go about grumpily stomping your bad faith takes over everything that confuses and upsets you..

[–] TheFonz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

There's no bad faith takes to be had as you added nothing new. Thanks, oh erudite historian. Thanks for the amazing insight you provided. Oh wait. Weve heard the same shit for the past two years. You really think very highly of yourself.