People Twitter

5274 readers

686 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a tweet or similar
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

1055

Why is no one talking about how unproductive it is to have verify every "hallucination" ChatGPT gives you? (lemmy.world)

submitted 6 days ago by phoneymouse@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

116 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Except for when you ask it to determine if a thing exists by describing its properties

Basic search can't answer that either. You're describing a task neither system is well equipped to accomplish.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

With basic search, it is extremely obvious that that feature does not exist.

With conversational search, the search itself gaslights you into believing it has this feature, as it understands how to syntactically parse the question, and then answers it confidently with a wrong answer.

I would much rather buy a car that cannot fly, knowing it cannot fly, than a car that literally talks to you and tells you it can fly, and sometimes manages to glide a bit, but also randomly nose dives into the ground whilst airborne.