People Twitter

5263 readers

1333 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

Mark NSFW content.
No doxxing people.
Must be a tweet or similar
No bullying or international politcs
Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

SendMeYourTaTas@sh.itjust.works

pelespirit@sh.itjust.works

1044

Why is no one talking about how unproductive it is to have verify every "hallucination" ChatGPT gives you? (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 days ago by phoneymouse@lemmy.world to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

116 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

referencing its data sources

Have you actually checked whether those sources exist yourself? It's been quite a while since I've used GPT, and I would be positively surprised if they've managed to prevent its generation of nonexistent citations.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

Have you actually checked whether those sources exist yourself

When I'm curious enough, yes. While you can find plenty of "AI lied to me" examples online, they're much harder to fish for in the application itself.

99 times out of 100, the references are good. But those cases aren't fun to dunk on.