this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
1074 points (98.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

5821 readers
1835 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If he's from California then my vote counts a little more because my state has less population. The smaller the state's population the more their vote counts.

[–] Sludgeyy@lemmy.world -1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Wyoming has the lowest population.

Makes sense why candidates spend all their time trying to get these powerful voters on their side. Those 3 electoral votes really makes it the most powerful swing state.

Someone in Wyoming has more electoral votes to their votes, yes. And I believe that is the point you're making.

If everyone in Wyoming voted for Candidate A. Candidate A has basically the same chance of winning or losing.

If everyone in California voted for Candidate A. Candidate A has a lot better chance of winning.

It's more powerful to be able to vote in something that actually matters than to vote in something that doesn't.

You could just not count any votes in Wyoming and still call the overall winner 99.999% of the time. It would have to come down to 3 electoral votes tie breaker for their votes to even matter. Whereas every vote in California always matters.

Like in this last election. If Harris won every "swing state". But Trump could have won California and he'd win the election.

Electoral college has It's pros and cons but "The smaller the state's population the more their vote counts." Isn't true.

It's the middle size, "swing states", that the voters have the most powerful.

You aren't a drop in the bucket like California, but your state has enough electoral votes to actually swing things.

[–] sour@feddit.org 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

It wasn't about how much the states electoral votes matter, but how much a single persons vote matters in the entire election.

If 50.000 people in California changes their vote it hardly matters. If 50.000 people in wyoming do that, it heavily influences the outcome of who wyoming votes for.

1 person in wyoming matters more than 1 person in California.