this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
578 points (99.5% liked)

HistoryPorn

4892 readers
387 users here now

If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.

Relive the Past in Jaw-Dropping Detail!

HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  9. No genocide or atrocity denialism.

Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts

Illustrations and paintings should go to History Drawings

Related Communities:

Military Porn

Forgotten Weapons

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 80 points 1 day ago (3 children)

From a 110 year old book I picked up recently:

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm fairly convinced that the reason internal combustion won - even though it would regularly break your wrist when you started it - was that it made loud noises.

Back then cars were a luxury, and if you're buying something flashy you want people to notice you. A gasoline engine sputtering down the road would draw far more attention than an electric motor, so people bought those.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

A gasoline engine sputtering down the road would draw far more attention than an electric motor, so people bought those.

They're still doing exactly this. ICE designs have never been quieter, but meanwhile Ford and GM are pumping out the L O U D E S T car options in decades.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 1 points 13 minutes ago

I've said adoption of EVs by that crowd will only come when they start slapping very loud and aggressive VESS options onto them

[–] grandkaiser@lemmy.world 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

From an engineering standpoint, liquid fuels have a far greater energy-to-weight ratio than batteries. Some of the largest advancements in combustion engines for the purpose of conveyance were made during the world wars. Noise was something they actively fought against. Loud tanks are scary, but unexpected tanks are much scarier. If they really needed it to be loud, sirens exist (see: Jericho siren). The energy-to-weight problem is only now finally being solved via modern batteries using exotic materials and processes well outside of early 1900's technology.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

That's the textbook answer but I think mine is more fun.

[–] grandkaiser@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Oh certainly! I only felt the need to add the textbook answer because of the... Conspiratorial side of Lemmy that will happily believe misleading information as long as it confirms pre-existing biases.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 1 points 15 minutes ago

It's too late, I've already accepted the other response as accurate gospel

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Fun to remember that Mr. Toad was a parody of all the dicks who drove cars.

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

It’s interesting to see this and be reminded that 110 years ago electricity was more readily available than gasoline. It took time for gas stations to become widespread. Even in the post-WWII era it was not uncommon for drivers to encounter signs warning that the last gas station was approaching and there would be no more for another 60+ miles (100+ kilometers, I suppose). It took decades to expand the gasoline distribution network.

In one sense electric vehicles are in the same boat today, at least in the US. From the standpoint of being able to charge at home, electric is more convenient and current models on sale likely have more than enough range for most people’s daily (or probably even weekly) commute. The cost advantage is also still there when charging at home. However, if you’re going on a roadtrip you’re much more likely to face long stretches without a fast charger, and probably no signs on the road warning you. It’s up to drivers to plan ahead to make sure they’ll have enough charge to make the next charger (and potentially have a backup location in case their first choice is full or broken). With the ubiquity of gas stations, and perhaps even more so GPS navigation on our phones, most drivers aren’t used to doing much planning when going on road trips anymore.

What is the title and who is the author of this book?

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 minutes ago

What's funny about that is it took, as you said, decades to expand the infrastructure for gas, needing stations and storage tanks and fuel trucks to deliver the gas... Electric's infrastructure needs... Um... Charging stations. Installed where there's already electricity.

People act like it's a major hurdle, but it's actually a much, much smaller one than gas had to overcome.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

The first ICE car drivers had to buy their gasoline in tin cans from the general store

[–] ch00f@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Storage Batteries Stationary and Portable by J.T. Niblett, M. I. E. E. Copyright 1911/1912.

Looks like Archive's got it: https://archive.org/details/storage_batteries_1912/page/n3/mode/2up

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

I think a lot of electric cars have trip planning built in these days.

With mine, I just punch in my destination and it routes and sets up chargers for me to hit. That said, I've never gone further than 900 miles on the west coast between Northern and Southern California, and a trip through the desert to Las Vegas, but it's always been smooth sailing.