this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
364 points (96.9% liked)

science

14848 readers
1009 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In this study, the scientists simulated the process of spaced learning by examining two types of non-brain human cells — one from nerve tissue and one from kidney tissue — in a laboratory setting.

These cells were exposed to varying patterns of chemical signals, akin to the exposure of brain cells to neurotransmitter patterns when we learn new information.

The intriguing part? These non-brain cells also switched on a “memory gene” – the same gene that brain cells activate when they detect information patterns and reorganize their connections to form memories.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] baldturkeyleg@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (3 children)

So hold on a minute - does this mean there might be some truth to the whole “eat your fallen enemy to gain experience” thing? That’s wild.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)

naw. its more like the nerve pathways through the body also have their own node-weighting long before they get to the brain. those are used in process sometimes allowing for memory-like function

its still a generated system that you cant just eat

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you sure I can't eat it? We should test this... for science.

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Are you sure I can’t eat it? We should test this… for science.

The question then being: would it still be considered science if it's not eaten raw but cooked and, say, accompanied with some wine?

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 23 hours ago

Such as a nice chianti?

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Doesn't count. They have to be slain in honorable battle.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 36 minutes ago

So being boiled to death doesn't count?

[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

Closer to that whole organ transplant affecting someone's personality I guess

[–] jmiller@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago

Eating a dictionary to improve your vocabulary would be equally effective to that theory, and for many of the same reasons. (As far as information transfer is concerned)

[–] rowrowrowyourboat@sh.itjust.works 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

No, because you're eating the flesh, so you're digesting it.

This is more relevant to organ transplants.

Apparently, it's a known phenomenon that some organ transplant recipients seem to inherit some traits and even memories of organ donors.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38694651/

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Wow, these examples are so cool.

Food Preferences:

  • developed aversion to meat after receiving a heart from a vegetarian donor.
  • experienced nausea after meals post-transplant from a donor with irregular eating habits.
  • developed a taste for green peppers and chicken nuggets, foods favored by her donor.

Musical Preferences:

  • began enjoying loud music post-transplant.
  • developed a love for music after receiving a heart from a musician.
  • started appreciating classical music, previously disliked, after transplant.

Sexual Preferences:

  • Male recipient of a heart from a lesbian artist experienced heightened desire toward women.
  • Lesbian recipient of a heterosexual woman's heart found attraction to men.

Other Preferences and Aversions:

  • Landscape artist's heart recipient developed interest in art.
  • Dancer's heart recipient shifted color preferences to cooler tones.
  • Fear of water developed post-transplant from drowning victim.

Memories:

  • describes sudden unusual tastes accompanied by thoughts about their donor's identity and life experiences.
  • feels tactile sensations corresponding to the impact of the car accident that killed their donor.
  • experiencing flashes of light and heat resembling the trauma suffered by their donor, who was shot in the face.
  • describes a vivid dream of reckless driving, mirroring the circumstances of their donor's fatal motorcycle accident.

Some recipients even experience dreams or memories aligning with their donor's identity, such as a woman envisioning a young man named Tim during a dream and later discovering her donor's name as Tim Lamirande

Unfortunately, though, I don't see any mention of how certain they were that the recipients didn't learn these things before experiencing them