this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
393 points (99.0% liked)

PC Gaming

8635 readers
498 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What I heard (on here, and I hope it's a vicious rumor) is that TPM 2.0 comes with backdoors accessible to Microsoft via the OS so that a significant chunk of the computer belongs to Big MS and not to the end user, and it will squeal and cause problems if the end user tries to take it back.

The whole point of TPM 1.0 hypothetically was to allow a larger secondary encryption key of a device to be accessible only by a small user-provided key (say a four-digit PIN), and requiring use of the key-query software to run to get the secondary key. A limited number of chances with longer delays with each wrong answer heightens security.

But this pissed off government law enforcement across the world, who want backdoors for when they want to crack the phone of a very important criminal.

It would be nice if Apple, Google and Microsoft had more respect for their end users than they do national and corporate institutions, but we know this isn't really the case, so it's at least plausible that TPMs 1.0 or 2.0 come pre-backdoored. It doesn't hurt that this is exactly what FBI and NSA want even though (Pre-9/11 and Pre-PATRIOT) NSA is supposed to be assuring that no-one, not even police can crack our secure communication protocols.

Despite efforts to look into it, I've yet to get an answer I can fully trust whether or not they are backdoored. But since Microsoft is notorious for exactly this kind of bullshit since the 1980s, I assume it's true that TPMs are backdoored until I find convincing information otherwise.

[–] Scary_le_Poo@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Please don't spread bullshit conspiracy theories.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

You have trustworthy sources to indicate it's a bullshit conspiracy theory? Cite them!

Otherwise you can express your skepticism without being hostile. Thanks.

[–] Scary_le_Poo@beehaw.org 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

You are making the claims, the onus is on you to cite your sources.

Do you have any trustworthy sources to back up these bullshit claims? I didn't think so. Now, fuck off.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I claimed it was a plausible rumor, and given Win10 and Win11 are already spyware and resistant to end-user full control, I already have strong cause to distrust Microsoft, which is what I said.

So chill your reactor before it melts down. Unless you want a block, because this is how you get a block.

[–] Scary_le_Poo@beehaw.org 1 points 5 hours ago

It's also plausible that you are the zodiac killer. I heard that you're an asshole on the road and that you're an inconsiderate prick who doesn't return his shopping cart to the corral.

See how that works? Don't spread bullshit and FUD.

You can block as much as you want, you're still gonna get called out on your shit, the difference is that you'll be the only one who doesn't see it.