this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
442 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

59594 readers
3330 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Writing a 100-word email using ChatGPT (GPT-4, latest model) consumes 1 x 500ml bottle of water It uses 140Wh of energy, enough for 7 full charges of an iPhone Pro Max

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Can we PLEASE shut that shit down? We were doing just fine without it.

[–] goog70@lemmy.today 3 points 3 hours ago

Billions of people have been using Google for years, and Google has been using artificial intelligence for years. It's nothing new.

[–] 13esq@lemmy.world -2 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I don't understand the hate for AI. It's a new technology that has some teething issues, but it's only going to get better and more efficient.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 12 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

it won't if you don't force it to. that's like saying companies will pollute less if you give them enough time. no, you have to grab their balls and force them to do it.

[–] 13esq@lemmy.world -4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's fair to say that pretty much every industry is more efficient and cleaner than it used to be and I don't see why AI would be an exception to that.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

i think you're not thinking about what efficiency means for corporations.

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 hours ago

Until it does, we shouldn't exacerbate the climate and resource issues we already have by blindly buying into the hype and building more and larger corporate-scale power gluttons to produce even more heat than we're already dealing with.

"AI" has potential, ideas like machine assistance with writing letters and improving security by augmenting human alertness are all nice. Unfortunately, it also has destructive potential for things like surveillance, even deadlier weapons or accelerating the wealth extraction of those with the capital to invest in building aforementioned power gluttons.

Additionally, it risks misuse and overreliance, which is particularly dangerous in the current stage where it can't entirely replace humans (yet), the issues of which may not immediately become apparent until they do damage.

If and until the abilities of AI reach the point where they can compensate tech illiteracy and we no longer need to worry about the exorbitant heat production, it shouldn't be deployed at scale at all, and even then its use needs to be scrutinised, regulated and that regulation is appropriately enforced (which basically requires significant social and political change, so good luck).