this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
691 points (97.4% liked)

politics

19135 readers
2287 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Drusas@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago (4 children)

No, but you can trade in a 3 or 4-year-old car in exchange for a 7 or 8-year-old car for about the same price, depending on what you're looking for.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 8 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

But selling your Tesla isn't even sticking it to Elon. You already bought the thing.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 8 hours ago

I didn't say it would be sticking it to Elon.

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

He still makes money off of charging, but you're right in that it's miniscule in comparison

Other manufacturers can use Tesla chargers now, and many times those are the best options on long road trips. This doesn’t really change anything. I can also choose to charge my Tesla at non-Tesla chargers and accomplish the same goal.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

A 7-8 year old car that people have been doing god knows what in for all those years and is it even maintained properly?

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That's a generic used car problem.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Yea? So why would you consider selling a functioning car for one that's objectively worse?

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 6 hours ago

It wasn't a suggestion. That's the option.

[–] Halosheep@lemm.ee 3 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Letting social media bully you into making stupid financial decisions is not the play.

Elon may be an idiot but he isn't the only person at Tesla. It's not like he's gone to the factory and hand built every vehicle. They have their flaws, but the cars themselves are still totally fine.

The only reason people even care is because some narcissistic billionaire can't stop yapping on social media.

[–] piradianssquared@lemmy.ca 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

They have their flaws, but the cars themselves are still totally fine.

Deadliest vehicle on the road: https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-news/tesla-highest-rate-deadly-accidents-study-1235176092/

[–] Halosheep@lemm.ee 2 points 12 hours ago

Though models from Hyundai, Chevrolet, Mitsubishi, Porsche, and Honda occupied the top five spots on the list, the Tesla Model Y, a mid-size SUV, came in sixth, with a fatal accident rate 3.7 times higher than the average car, and 4.8 times higher than the average SUV. The Model S rate is double that of the average car.

Per the article, they are certainly one of the most fatal in the event of an accident but not the deadliest. Sixth place is definitely not a good ranking but all of the brands above them are highly reputable and long established.

For comparison purposes, the five cars above it had a fatal accident rate at 4.6x or higher more likely than the average.

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

They have their flaws, but the cars themselves are still totally fine.

Reliability statistics and some of the widest engineering tolerances in the industry disagree with you - they are really, objectively not good cars... but they're comfy, so people don't care.

[–] Halosheep@lemm.ee 2 points 15 hours ago

Can you point to objective data that shows they're worse than most other car brands?

I've heard the same but it's usually in the comments of some sensationalized news content after a tragic accident occurs, as if other vehicles don't also have bad things happen in a collision.

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

If I’m looking for another EV with decent range, then options are pretty slim.