this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
596 points (96.1% liked)

World News

39151 readers
2533 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Elon Musk labeled Britain a “tyrannical police state” on X, criticized Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s leadership, and questioned the imprisonment of far-right activist Tommy Robinson.

Musk’s comments coincide with his role as a key adviser to Trump, raising concerns in the U.K. about its relationship with the incoming administration.

Musk also criticized Starmer’s policies, including increased farm inheritance taxes, and boosted far-right content on X.

This follows similar clashes with other U.S. allies, including Germany and Australia, over their domestic policies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Teknikal@eviltoast.org 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

I was in the position I felt I had no choice they kept demanding things like non existent Facebook accounts, they wouldn't tell me what I was accused off even it was just constant interviews at places harder and harder for me to get to. I was starting to go mad because I didn't even understand why they had raided me in the first place.

It cost me a lot more than I could afford to hire a barrister but I had the strong feeling I'd be jailed without even knowing why if I didn't.

But yeah the whole thing seemed to stem from one guys joke at somewhere I wasn't.

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Sorry, I mean, instead of a solicitor?

[–] Teknikal@eviltoast.org 3 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

Truthfully they arrested my dad at the same time as trying to get me which made me feel guilty as hell despite the fact I didn't know what was going on.

I'm not actually sure why a "barrister" my dad hired him first and then probably because of my dad I let him stand for me also..

I only regretted it when I saw the bill, he did keep me out of all the nonsense since he was hired though but yeah Bill made me poor for a long TIME, Same time he might be the only one who made the police behave.

[–] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not surprised. A barrister is, traditionally, who you would hire to represent you, specifically within a higher court, when it sounds like all you needed to do was chat to the duty solicitor for free.

What a mix up. It sounds like your dad really screwed you over there. You must've been very cross when you found out

[–] Teknikal@eviltoast.org 3 points 22 hours ago

Yeah it cost me a lot financially but I was happy the police had to drop all their nonsense. I don't really blame my dad he only got mixed up in it from trying to protect me.

But yeah in hindsight a barrister might have been overkill.