PCGaming

6547 readers

722 users here now

Rule 0: Be civil

Rule #1: No spam, porn, or facilitating piracy

Rule #2: No advertisements

Rule #3: No memes, PCMR language, or low-effort posts/comments

Rule #4: No tech support or game help questions

Rule #5: No questions about building/buying computers, hardware, peripherals, furniture, etc.

Rule #6: No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.

Rule #7: No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts

Rule #8: No off-topic posts/comments

Rule #9: Use the original source, no editorialized titles, no duplicates

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

CSFFlame@lemmy.world

294

Instead Of Making Better Games, Reports Allege That Ubisoft Wants Steam To Hide Certain Data...Like Player Counts (www.mmobomb.com)

submitted 18 hours ago by ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to c/pcgaming@lemmy.world

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Fandom Pulse is reporting (paywall), according to a "Ubisoft insider", that the beleaguered video game company is pushing back on Steam to try and get certain data points removed from public view. This would include data points like peak and concurrent users. The insider continues by saying that Star Wars Outlaws has still failed to surpass the 2 million units sold point having been released for almost 3 months. That's a far cry (get it?) from the 5 million in the first month some investors were hoping for at launch.

The report also alleges that Ubisoft isn't alone. Other companies would also like Valve to stop reporting numbers that they'd rather paint their own way on investor calls, or just dodge entirely like Ubisoft has done on recent calls where the lackluster performance of Star Wars Outlaws has come up.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] VolumetricShitCompressor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Seems like Valve is still a privatly owned company, poor aaa studios. Let's see how GabeN feels about that.

[–] Godort@lemm.ee 27 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

They might pull their games from steam and try to sell them on UPlay again

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

That would be nice, then their games won't clutter the Steam store so much.

Maybe epic will give them money to go exclusive there.

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 22 points 17 hours ago

I couldn't give a shit either way. Not ever going to buy a Ubisoft game again. I was interested in Star Wars Outlaws until I heard they were involved.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 12 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Isn't the reason they gave up on that because they lost all their customers?

I actually sympathize with their desire to resist silly reporting over player counts, because it can snowball and generally it's silly not-news. But you do have to actually sell games at some point.

[–] subignition@fedia.io 21 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

If they focused more on actually making good games, instead of monetizing the shit out of mid ones, their player count problems would solve themselves.

[–] conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Oh, I'm not saying that the reporting is why they don't sell games. I just think it's mostly nonsense.

I'm saying that they have a big enough sample to recognize that pulling off of Steam isn't a reasonable path forward, because people aren't willing to deal with their launcher or epic. They know that they can't push Valve around.

[–] subignition@fedia.io 2 points 13 hours ago

Yeah, sorry, I wasn't interpreting it that way, it seems clear that they want to eliminate Steam's reporting just because it makes them look bad, not because the numbers themselves are influencing sales