this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
114 points (97.5% liked)

Shrinkflation

302 readers
1 users here now

A community about companies who sneakily adjust their product instead of the price in the hopes that consumers won't notice.

We notice. We feel ripped off. Let's call out those products so we can shop better.

What is Shrinkflation?

Shrinkflation is a term often coined to refer to a product reducing in size or quality while the price remains the same or increases.

Companies will often claim that this is necessary due to inflation, although this is rarely the case. Over the course of the pandemic, they have learned that they can mark up inelastic goods, which are goods with an intangible demand, such as food, as much as they want, and consumers will have no choice but to purchase it anyway because they are necessities.

From Wikipedia:

In economics, shrinkflation, also known as the grocery shrink ray, deflation, or package downsizing, is the process of items shrinking in size or quantity, or even sometimes reformulating or reducing quality, while their prices remain the same or increase. The word is a portmanteau of the words shrink and inflation.

[...]

Consumer advocates are critical of shrinkflation because it has the effect of reducing product value by "stealth". The reduction in pack size is sufficiently small as not to be immediately obvious to regular consumers. An unchanged price means that consumers are not alerted to the higher unit price. The practice adversely affects consumers' ability to make informed buying choices. Consumers have been found to be deterred more by rises in prices than by reductions in pack sizes. Suppliers and retailers have been called upon to be upfront with customers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shrinkflation

Community Rules

  1. Posts must be about shrinkflation, skimpflation or another related topic where a company has reduced their offering without reducing the price.
  2. The product must be a household item. No cars, industrial equipment, etc.
  3. You must provide a comparison between the old and new products, what changed and evidence of that change. If possible, also provide the prices and their currency, as well as purchase dates.
  4. Meta posts are allowed, but must be tagged using the [META] prefix

n.b.: for moderation purposes, only posts in English or in French are accepted.##

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

If anyone can explain how it can be 3.3 ounces in the new can and 3.6 in the old while grams and millilitres remain the same i would love to know.

The damn can is also ever so slightly smaller you can see it very well but you can feel it and measure it

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MudMan@fedia.io 30 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

By the power of a quick search, I'm told that 3.6 OZ is actually 102 grams, while 3.3 OZ is 93.6. 96 grams is 3.38 OZ, so one has to assume they're starting from grams and rounding down (even though they'd be justified to report 3.4 instead, honestly). It's not fluid ounces because that'd be somewhere in the region of 5, again according to search.

So most likely, it's a typo of some sort, or proof that non-metric systems should be banned by all humanity. This is also how European basketball players grow several centimeters when they start playing in the NBA.

Interestingly, pictures of the product online alternately show 104 and 96 grams. Volume wouldn't have to change, because you can just pressurize the can less to include less product. Oh, and yet another search tells me the reported net weight should not include the weight of the propellant.

Also, what are you doing buying Beckham's spray deodorant? Multiple times? I mean...

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah the whole situation makes no sense.

As far as buying multiples im alllergic to something in some deodorants and i get rashes under my arms. This one hasn't so I have been using it for over 10 years. I have many many cans in the cupboardbecausewr buy them when they come half price.

My wife likes the smell I like the smell too.

And as far as I know it's not evil right?

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh, no, I'm mostly joking. It's just... celebrity "lifestyle brands", you know? Or maybe you don't know. I'm certainly the type of person that buys "deodorant" brand deodorant, I may be the outlier here.

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 6 points 3 weeks ago

Nah had no idea when i first bought it. It was just cheap and it didn't hurt me haha.

I've never even thought about the David beckham relevance at all

[–] 200ok@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Some deodorants irritate me as well.

I eventually found out that it was a "72 hour" deodorant that I was reapplying every 24 hours (after my shower where, I assure you, I was washing my pits) and it was building up. It was so itchy and I'd scratch until I was raw.

Now I only wear it every other day and use a "natural" deodorant in between.

Might be different for you, obvs

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You might be on to something there, i used to use the sports oriented ones that were longer lasting.

Ah well this one does the job and my wife loves it cause she associates the smell with me so I can't change haha

[–] 200ok@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Clearly the winning choice 😁

[–] Zier@fedia.io 2 points 3 weeks ago

Just to add; it's clearly measured by weight because 150 ml is 5 fluid ounces. And my comment, buy unscented deodorant and an actual bottle of cologne, it smells nicer.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

proof that non-metric systems should be banned by all humanity

DON'T TAKE AVOIRDUPOIS FROM ME