Technology

59774 readers

3103 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

211

Googling Is for Old People. That’s a Problem for Google. (www.wsj.com)

submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by mesamunefire@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

146 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://archive.today/?run=1&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wsj.com%2Ftech%2Fgoogling-is-for-old-people-thats-a-problem-for-google-5188a6ed

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 79 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I was Googling just fine until Google ruined it with "SEO" and AI so that completely irrelevant results dominate the first 2 or 3 pages.

[–] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

It's this last two years where it has gotten really bad in my opinion. Before you could at least navigate the ads ridden site. Now base Google search is tremendously worse.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago

YouTube search is SO MUCH WORSE now. it just gives up and shows random stuff after like 3 results
I searched "friends invited me to lethal company". I got 6 results (one of which is a song?) before it gave up and showed "people also watched this" and "you might like this" aka anything even semi related to Lethal Company

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Don't get me wrong, fuck google, but how much can we blame google for SEO? That's just people gaming the system, and they'd be doing it no matter how google presented their results.

Maybe there is a whole cooperation aspect that I'm not aware of.

[–] wreel@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 days ago

Google did a rollback of anti-SEO indexing features because the intention is that users issue more searches. Ever since the ads side of the business won the war for the soul of Google the experience has gotten worse on purpose.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

They can only game the system because Google made a system like that possible and has never done anything to combat the gaming of it.

[–] skulkingaround@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

Come on man I don't like google either, but SEO exploitation has been a cat and mouse game since search engines were invented. They're all varying levels of suck the last few years. It's not an easy problem to solve, and AI has made it far more difficult.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago

Right, but we know how people are (look at torrenting, piracy, drm, etc.), and people would figure out ways to gamify it no matter what, I believe. But you are correct that they don't seem to necessarily have any interest in stopping it. Because of course not, it's all about the bottom line.