United States | News & Politics

4186 readers

366 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

No pics of text

Memes are now allowed, as long as they're US centric, general political memes please see !politicalmemes@lemmy.ca

Post news related to the United States.

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

exposingfash@midwest.social

cm0002@infosec.pub

cm0002@lemy.lol

118

Parents Are Being Asked to Pay the Cost of Delivering Their Babies in Advance (truthout.org)

submitted 2 years ago by Garibaldee@lemm.ee to c/usa@midwest.social

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 49 points 2 years ago (3 children)

“Why is there a fertility crisis?”

[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Other than "line go up" economics, which I don't care about, I don't see a "crisis." Overall, less people is good for people and, more importantly, all the other life we are supposed to share the planet with.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

100% for the wellbeing of life on earth. 0% for publicly traded corporation stock prices, at least in the medium term. That line can't go up forever.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Less people is good for people, but decreasing people isn't. Japan and Korea are currently suffering from this and it's affecting a lot more than line go up economics.

[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You don't get to less without decreasing, lol. Less economic growth and a temporary issue with too many old people. That's not a bad trade off for a better future for all.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You don't get to less without decreasing, lol.

Yes, which is exactly the problem.

Less economic growth and a temporary issue with too many old people. That's not a bad trade off for a better future for all.

Okay good luck convincing anyone else of that with how things are looking in South Korea.

[–] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

I don't have to convince anyone, it is happening regardless. Yes, people will bitch and moan, but temporary hardships for the elderly who allowed this to happen is a small price to pay.

[–] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

And why do states care so much about the birth rate crisis? Because it hurts them financially. https://missouriindependent.com/2024/10/22/missouri-mifepristone-lawsuit-andrew-bailey-teen-pregnancy/

[–] MsPenguinette@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We’ll just do what Russia does and outlaw anything that even encourages not having kids

[–] IAmLamp@fedia.io 9 points 2 years ago

Wait - that means outlawing this pre-pay system. Effectively slapping regulations on the free market. In fact, you could argue the costs of delivery, in general, encourages not having kids. Guess if conservatives want to emulate pooty poot we have to have deliveries subsidized. This alignment with Russia won’t take long to start making conservatives heads explode.