this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
186 points (99.5% liked)

Trams, Trolleys and Streetcars

738 readers
5 users here now

A Community for the interessting world of Trams, Trolleys and Streetcars!

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

PSA in Naarm (Melbourne), Australia warning about the dangers of trams.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ftbd@feddit.org 42 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Anything but the metric system

[–] ArcaneGadget@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's anywhere from 21 to 96 tonnes depending on species and gender. Assuming average weight ranges. Writing that a tram weighs as much as 30 rhinos is about as useful as writing "quite a lot"...

[–] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

How much different would a person come out in an accident with a 21 tonnes tram versus a 96 tonnes tram?

[–] ArcaneGadget@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

About the same i guess. A lighter tram probably has a shorter braking distance though. And in relation to other vehicles 96 tonnes is a lot more kinetic energy and damage. But that's not really the point is it? The gist is; that this thing is heavy and moving at speed, so don't get in the way. But the way they have chosen to describe that, is hilariously convoluted and imprecise. Especially because most people, me included, have no concept about how much a rhino weighs, much less 30 of them...

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

About 75 less damage.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm a little surprised to see it in Australia. I thought they used the metric system... Are they being Americanized?

[–] Lux@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 weeks ago

If you say "21 to 96 tonnes", that seems like a lot. If you say "30 rhinos", thats something that you don't want to be in front of

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Ameristralia moment

[–] princessnorah@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago

What an odd comment 🤔