this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
92 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

29 readers
2 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 2 years ago
92
Tesla exaggerated EV range so much that drivers thought cars were broken (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 year ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/tech@kbin.social
44 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Inundated with complaints, Tesla created "Diversion Team" to cancel appointments.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MxM111@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In the article they talk about range estimates done by car itself. So you are driving and thinking you have 50 miles, while actually only 30 miles left.

[–] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Not a Tesla fanboy but just noting EV range in general can be quite hard to predict - there's a huge drop off in efficiency at higher speeds, so driving through town I may get 350 mi range on my 300 mi rated EV6, but on the freeway at 75+ mph, I probably get less than 250.

Not surprised Tesla exaggerates their range though. YMMV.

[–] catsdontmountainbike@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've never seen a more appropriate use of ymmv

[–] MxM111@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Hard to predict means that half of the time you would under estimate the mileage, if done correctly. This is not what is going on here.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Some people would probably complain if they had a 100mile trip up a mountain pass and it took more than 100 miles of energy.

At least when you plan a route the % indicator takes that into account vs a plain estimation.

My best trip once going up a pass was around 70km of the reading staying within 1 or 2km the entire time when going down it.

But ya there's so many variables. But if they were fudging calculations that'd be bad.