this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2024
449 points (94.6% liked)

Antiwork

8371 readers
4 users here now

  1. We're trying to improving working conditions and pay.

  2. We're trying to reduce the numbers of hours a person has to work.

  3. We talk about the end of paid work being mandatory for survival.

Partnerships:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Yayannick@lemmy.ml
uthredii@lemmy.ml
sexy_peach@feddit.de
yogthos@lemmy.ml
449
Is the New York Times fuckin' serious right now. (AKA another attempt to undermine Luigi's support). (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 week ago by BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world to c/antiwork@lemmy.ml
100 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thank you!

Being neutral cute both ways, he is innocent until a jury of his peers decide to vote guilty.

Just hope he doesn’t sign a confession, there is plenty of resources for him to fight this.

Also, I think all people charged with a crime deserve this benefit or the doubt.

[–] logging_strict@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

There's that word again

What peers?

The rando software dev is a genius being extradited to a State full of boot lickers and sell outs.

His peers are minimally accomplished well known FOSS devs.

There should be a higher burden of evidence which includes reproducible unittests and his peers should be well acquainted with writing maintainable and sufficient test suites.

Then lets talk about peers and courts.