this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2024
675 points (95.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

6014 readers
2688 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Almost every time an article like this is posted, the contents are the result of one or two comments out of thousands, or a Reddit post that didn't gain much traction outside of "eh, sure, I guess?"

Tangentially related, IMO there should be an "author review" site, where if someone posts a stupid article like this, it is referenced in a database against their name and their frame of reference for the content is called out. Rank "journalists" against this, and eventually the people starting out in the industry posting AI-generated shite that doesn't hold up will start to err on the side of caution.

[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You've just re-invented journalistic standards and peer review.

It is how the news cycle is supposed to work. One journalist says something, others verify or disprove it publicly.

The problem is that there is now no difference between journalism and content or between news channels and platforms.

Most journalists are just doing Op-Ed now anyways.