this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
338 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59970 readers
3255 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 17 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (4 children)

This is for cold and archival storage right?

I couldn't imagine seek times on any disk that large. Or rebuild times....yikes.

[–] noobface@lemmy.world 15 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

up your block size bro πŸ’ͺ get them plates stacking 128KB+ a write and watch your throughput gains max out πŸ‹οΈ all the ladies will be likeπŸ™‹β€β™€οΈ. Especially if you get those reps sequentially it's like hitting the juice πŸ’‰ for your transfer speeds.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

This is my favorite post ever.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 15 points 20 hours ago

Definitely not for either of those. Can get way better density from magnetic tape.

They say they got the increased capacity by increasing storage density, so the head shouldn't have to move much further to read data.

You'll get further putting a cache drive in front of your HDD regardless, so it's vaguely moot.

[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 5 points 17 hours ago

Random access times are probably similar to smaller drives but writing the whole drive is going to be slow

[–] RedWeasel@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago

For a full 32GB at the max sustained speed(275MB/s), 32ish hours to transfer a full amount, 36 if you assume 250MB/s the whole run. Probably optimistic. CPU overhead could slow that down in a rebuild. That said in a RAID5 of 5 disks, that is a transfer speed of about 1GB/s if you assume not getting close to the max transfer rate. For a small business or home NAS that would be plenty unless you are running greater than 10GiBit ethernet.