this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2024
156 points (94.3% liked)

World News

39333 readers
2642 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump suggested Canada could become the U.S.’s “51st state,” claiming it would benefit Canadians through lower taxes and military protection.

The remark follows tensions over Trump’s proposed 25% tariffs on Canadian imports, which shocked Canadian leaders, including Ontario Premier Doug Ford, who likened it to betrayal.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau dismissed the annexation talk as unserious but unveiled a $1 billion border security plan to address U.S. concerns.

The escalating rhetoric, including insults from Trump ally Elon Musk, highlights strained Canada-U.S. relations ahead of Trump’s second term.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 21 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

Just one state? With 40 million people? Okay, enjoy the House of Representatives massively ballooning.

It wouldn’t though. It would be reapportioned. It’s locked at 435 due to the 1929 Permanent Apportionment Act. You’ll note that 1929 precedes the introduction of both Alaska and Hawaii as states.

The house being locked to that number diminishes the legislative (and electoral college) power of larger states (which is infuriatingly by-design).

[–] Carrolade@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Prob just a territory, really. Can't be ruining our perfectly even 100 Senators.

[–] bitwise@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 hours ago

All of the apartheid, none of the citizenship!

Can't wait to be called a dirty snowback in my own city by my American masters!

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

The house needs to balloon massively anyway. The numbers are way under where they have been historically for representatives per capita.

[–] raktheundead@fedia.io 9 points 7 hours ago

The US has one of the worst ratios of representatives in their legislature per capita in the world, no less.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, but not all from one state.

[–] drolex@sopuli.xyz 11 points 8 hours ago

California is around 40M already, so this wouldn't be the most moronic aspect of this idea

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 10 points 8 hours ago

That's about the same population as California actually.