this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2024
425 points (99.8% liked)
Futurology
1886 readers
53 users here now
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That wouldn't be enough to cause real damage tbh.
Lead is toxic but you still need quite a bit of it and it's absorbed wildly differently based on medium. That's why the Romans could have lead pipes that were mostly not that dangerous due to their water being very hard while leaded gasoline used tetraethyl lead which is more potent and it's inhaled rather than ingested.
Basically eating/drinking lead contaminated resources only give you like 1-10% of the actual poison while inhaling gives you the full 100%
You're correct. The risk is there, but it's not high.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6675757/
Apparently, the human stomach dissolves small bullet fragments of metallic lead. That's probably bad.
https://www.livsmedelsverket.se/globalassets/publikationsdatabas/rapporter/2014/bly-i-viltkott---del-1-ammunitionsrester-och-kemisk-analys.pdf
You don't need lead.
Romans did develop lead toxicity but it was delayed because of the calcium salts in the hard water making a preventive layer. Which made leaching of the lead difficult.
"need quite a bit of it"... to be poisoned. There's context my dude.
Sorry didn't get that.
No problem, cheers!